Manufacturer Quality Index

Rankings combine our stored reliability scores (from NHTSA, RepairPal, CarComplaints, Consumer Reports where available) into a brand index. Each model line is weighted equally; within a model, newer model years count more than very old ones. This is an independent composite—not Consumer Reports’ member survey. Higher scores indicate better predicted reliability.

Data Sources: NHTSA, Consumer Reports, CarComplaints, RepairPal
Scale: 0-100 (Higher = Better)
Manufacturer Rankings
RankManufacturerQuality IndexRatingVehiclesModels
#1Dodge
79
Excellent685
#2Ford
74
Excellent15511
#3Acura
74
Excellent645
#4Chevrolet
71
Excellent15311
#5Mazda
70
Excellent907
#6Toyota
67
Good18812
#7Honda
67
Good1279
#8Volkswagen
67
Good766
#9Mercedes-Benz
65
Good1138
#10Kia
65
Good998
#11BMW
64
Good1359
#12Audi
64
Good1188
#13RAM
64
Good624
#14GMC
64
Good805
#15Nissan
63
Good15410
#16Lexus
63
Good1158
#17Subaru
63
Good1017
#18Jeep
62
Good1017
#19Porsche
62
Good876
#20Hyundai
61
Good1028
#21Tesla
57
Average475
How Quality Index is Calculated

Per model year

Uses the stored overall reliability score (0–100). That score already reflects scrapers’ blend of sources (including NHTSA and complaint signals where applicable), so we do not subtract raw complaint or recall counts again—doing so double-counted and biased high-volume vehicles. When component scores (powertrain, body, electrical) disagree meaningfully with the headline score, we blend slightly toward the component average.

Across years (same model)

  • Recency: newer model years get higher weight (exponential decay by age; floor so old years still contribute a little).

Brand index

The manufacturer score is the simple average of each model line’s index (each model counts equally—not every model-year row), which aligns better with “how good is this brand’s lineup” than averaging every year of every vehicle.

Data sources

Underlying rows come from your scraped pipeline (NHTSA, CarComplaints, RepairPal, Consumer Reports when scraped, etc.). Coverage and source mix still affect results; this algorithm only fixes aggregation and double-counting.